://osf.io/4khgj

osf:Registration
How do people react to emotionality in organisational diversity statements?
https://osf.io/4khgj
more details...
dcterms:available
2024-01-30
dcterms:created
2022-07-11
dcterms:dateCopyrighted
2021
dcterms:description
To attract and retain more diverse workforce and to create a more welcoming environment, organisations embrace diversity initiatives manifested in diversity statements on their websites. These diversity statements signal an organisation’s commitment to diversity (McNab & Johnston, 2002) and that the workplace is inclusive and fair to members of different groups (Dover et al., 2020). The underlying assumption of diversity statements is that they serve as persuasive messages for individuals to form positive attitudes toward an organisation (e.g., that it is a good place to work) stemming from its support for diversity. Emerging evidence related to the information processing of persuasive messages indicates that the effects of diversity statements on perceivers’ attitudes toward organisations depend on the persuasiveness of the statements. One way to increase organisational attractiveness for members of the groups that are underrepresented in an organisation is to use salient cues indicating inclusion (e.g., Cundiff et al., 2018; Jansen et al., 2021; Klysing et al., 2021). Persuasiveness of a message can increase when employing emotions (e.g., van Kleef et al., 2011). The emotions as social information theory posits that individuals use the emotional expressions of others as information, that is people rely on the expressed emotions by others in order to form or change attitudes and to make decisions (van Kleef, 2009, 2017; van Kleef et al., 2012). Following this evidence, we want to examine to what extent emotionality in diversity statements contributes to more positive attitudes toward organisations that issue them. Even though people tend to express the emotions they feel in one way or another, they do so to a various degree. According to the emotions as social information theory, observers can experience emotions as a response to others’ emotional expressions or make inferences about the meaning of an emotional expression, which subsequently influence their attitudes (van Kleef, 2009, 2017; van Kleef et al., 2012). We presume that such process also takes place in reaction to emotional expressions by organizations in written statements. Consequentially, this process should result in stronger effects on attitudes when people are exposed to more emotionally expressive content. Therefore, we predict that respondents will demonstrate more positive attitudes toward an organisation after reading a diversity statement with higher emotionality than after reading one with lower emotionality or no emotionality cues (control condition), and they will demonstrate more positive attitudes after reading a diversity statement with lower emotionality compared to one with no emotionality cues (hypothesis 1). Emotional expressions by an organisation may evoke reciprocal emotional reactions in observers, that is, in the present research positive emotionality in diversity statements should evoke positive emotions in the readers. Therefore, we predict that the relationship between emotionality in diversity statements and attitudes toward an organisation will be mediated by respondents’ emotional reactions, that is higher levels of emotionality will predict stronger positive emotional reactions which, in turn, will be related to more positive attitudes toward the organisation (hypothesis 2). At the same time, people with past experiences of being excluded can be more susceptible to emotional cues. Specifically, individuals who have experienced social exclusion were found to rely on affect rather than cognition in processing persuasive messages because their ability to make inferences was reduced due to rumination about exclusionary events (Lu & Sinha, 2017). Therefore, we predict that diversity statements with higher levels of emotionality (vs. lower vs. no) will evoke stronger (vs. weaker) emotional reactions in respondents with more frequent experience of social exclusion as compared to respondents with less frequent experience of social exclusion (hypothesis 3).
dcterms:identifier
https://osf.io/4khgj
https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/4KHGJ
dcterms:modified
2023-01-16
dcterms:title
How do people react to emotionality in organisational diversity statements?
osf:storageByteCount
dcterms:conformsTo
dcterms:creator
dcterms:isVersionOf

://osf.io/akn9u

osf:Project
High emotionality in diversity statements promotes organisational attractiveness
more details...
dcterms:created
2021-06-16
dcterms:dateCopyrighted
2021
dcterms:identifier
https://osf.io/akn9u
https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/AKN9U
dcterms:title
High emotionality in diversity statements promotes organisational attractiveness
dcterms:creator
dcterms:publisher
dcterms:rights
owl:sameAs
sameAs
dcterms:publisher
dcterms:rights
dcterms:subject

://api.osf.io/v2/subjects/584240da54be81056cecac68

skos:Concept
Psychology
more details...
skos:prefLabel
Psychology
skos:broader
skos:inScheme

://api.osf.io/v2/subjects/584240da54be81056cecaab6

skos:Concept
Social Psychology
more details...
skos:prefLabel
Social Psychology
skos:broader

://api.osf.io/v2/subjects/584240da54be81056cecac68

skos:Concept
Psychology
more details...
skos:prefLabel
Psychology
skos:broader
skos:inScheme
skos:inScheme
dcterms:type
owl:sameAs
sameAs
dcat:accessService
osf:archivedAt
osf:contains

://osf.io/zr48n

osf:File
Gender-Equality-Index-Final-report-2020-210120.pdf
more details...
dcterms:created
2022-07-11
dcterms:identifier
https://osf.io/zr48n
dcterms:modified
2022-07-11
osf:fileName
Gender-Equality-Index-Final-report-2020-210120.pdf
osf:filePath
/Archive of OSF Storage/Study 1/Gender-Equality-Index-Final-report-2020-210120.pdf
osf:hasFileVersion

://osf.io/zr48n
?revision=1

osf:FileVersion
more details...
dcterms:created
2021-07-07
dcterms:extent
15.5 MB
dcterms:format
application/octet-stream
dcterms:modified
2021-07-07
osf:versionNumber
1
dcterms:creator
dcterms:requires
osf:storageRegion
osf:isContainedBy
://osf.io/4khgj
How do people react to emotionality in organisational diversity statements?

://osf.io/g8uj3

osf:File
EL20_variables.pdf
more details...
dcterms:created
2022-07-11
dcterms:identifier
https://osf.io/g8uj3
dcterms:modified
2022-07-11
osf:fileName
EL20_variables.pdf
osf:filePath
/Archive of OSF Storage/Study 1/EL20_variables.pdf
osf:hasFileVersion

://osf.io/g8uj3
?revision=1

osf:FileVersion
more details...
dcterms:created
2021-07-07
dcterms:extent
0.151 MB
dcterms:format
application/octet-stream
dcterms:modified
2021-07-07
osf:versionNumber
1
dcterms:creator
dcterms:requires
osf:storageRegion
osf:isContainedBy
://osf.io/4khgj
How do people react to emotionality in organisational diversity statements?

://osf.io/k9fxt

osf:File
Study 1 data.xlsx
more details...
dcterms:created
2022-07-11
dcterms:identifier
https://osf.io/k9fxt
dcterms:modified
2022-07-11
osf:fileName
Study 1 data.xlsx
osf:filePath
/Archive of OSF Storage/Study 1/Study 1 data.xlsx
osf:hasFileVersion

://osf.io/k9fxt
?revision=1

osf:FileVersion
more details...
dcterms:created
2022-01-10
dcterms:extent
0.264 MB
dcterms:format
application/octet-stream
dcterms:modified
2022-01-10
osf:versionNumber
1
dcterms:creator
dcterms:requires
osf:storageRegion
osf:isContainedBy
://osf.io/4khgj
How do people react to emotionality in organisational diversity statements?
osf:hostingInstitution
osf:storageRegion
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is primary topic of
prov:qualifiedAttribution
qualifiedAttribution
dcat:hadRole
prov:agent
agent
dcat:hadRole
prov:agent
agent
dcat:hadRole
prov:agent
agent